Annotated Bibliography On Rsa Cryptography - 1900 Words

Introduction RSA cryptography is vastly used to encrypt and decrypt message while communicating through internet and in the field of digital signature. This encryption system is used regularly in web browsers, chat applications email, vpn and any other types of communications that require securely sending data to severs or the other people.[8] RSA cryptography is an asymmetrical cryptography system. Because it have two keys. One is public another is private. The encryption key is public while the decryption key is private. So only the person with the correct decryption key can decipher the encrypted message. Everyone have their own encryption and decryption keys. The keys must be made in such a way that the decryption key may not easily†¦show more content†¦Which is by trying every possible combination. The length of the key determines the strength. DES uses a 64-bit key, but eight of those bits are used for parity checks, effectively limiting the key to 56-bits. So, it would take a maxi mum of 256 or 72,057,594,037,927,936 attempts to find the correct key. In present state, this is not safe because this amount of combination isn’t too high. Even so, up-to 1990’s mid this method was very popular and widely used. In 1998 a computer system broke this security in 56 hours which later reduced in 22 hours. So presently instead of providing compatibility in some instances, reliance on DES is a serious security problem for data confidentiality and should be avoided. As encryption strength is directly proportional to key size and 56-bit key length is not enough for present computing system so in 1997, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced an initiative to choose a successor to DES, in 2001, it selected the Advanced Encryption Standard as a replacement. [1] 2. Triple DSE method was designed to take the place of Data Encryption Standard (DES) algorithm. Triple DES was the recommended standard and vastly used symmetric algorithm in the industry. This system uses three individual keys each having 56-bits. So the total key length becomes 128-bits which is more secured than normal DES system. Although slowly became out of date Triple DES still capable manages to make a dependable hardware encryptionShow MoreRelatedA Research on the Internal Control for Information Security3378 Words   |  13 Pagesï » ¿Internal Control for Information Security PLEASE PUT THE TOPIC DEFINITION STATEMENT HERE AT THE FIRST PAGE PLEASE PUT THE ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY AT THE LAST PAGE BEFORE THE REFERENCE PAGE Introduction Control is a set of mechanism that assists an organization to attain the desired objective. Control is fundamental to achieve organizational goal, and control aligns the aspiration of workforce with their capabilities. On the other hand, internal control for information security is the practice

Why I Didn t Kill My Wife - 1725 Words

On April 12, 1987, Michael Morton sat down to write a letter. †¨Ã¢â‚¬Å"Your Honor,† he began, â€Å"I’m sure you remember me. I was convicted of murder, in your court, in February of this year.† He wrote each word carefully, sitting cross-legged on the top bunk in his cell at the Wynne prison unit, in Huntsville. â€Å"I have been told that you are to decide if I am ever to see my son, Eric, again. I haven’t seen him since the morning that I was convicted. I miss him terribly and I know that he has been asking about me.† Referring to the declarations of innocence he had made during his trial, he continued, â€Å"I must reiterate my innocence. I did NOT kill my wife. You cannot imagine what it is like to lose your wife the way I did, then to be falsely accused†¦show more content†¦Christine with damp hair, smiling—this was how he wanted to remember her. The last time he had seen her was on the morning of August 13, 1986, the day after his thirty-second birthday. He had glanced at her as she lay in bed, asleep, before he left for work around five-thirty. He returned home that afternoon to find the house cordoned off with yellow crime-scene tape. Six weeks later, he was arrested for her murder. He had no criminal record, no history of violence, and no obvious motive, but the Williamson County Sheriff’s Office, failing to pursue other leads, had zeroed in on him from the start. Although no physical evidence tied him to the crime, he was charged with first-degree murder. Prosecutors argued that he had become so enraged with Christine for not wanting to have sex with him on the night of his birthday that he had bludgeoned her to death. When the guilty verdict was read, Michael’s legs buckled beneath him. District attorney Ken Anderson told reporters afterward, â€Å"Life in prison is a lot better than he deserves.† The conviction had triggered a bitter custody battle between Christine’s family—who, like many people in Michael’s life, came to believe that he was guilty—and Michael’s parents. The question of who would be awarded custody of Eric was to be resolved by state district judge William Lott, who had also presided over Michael’s trial. If Christine’s family won custody, Michael was justifiably concerned that he would never see his son again. TwoShow MoreRelatedI Am Planning On Buying The Xulu Panelbeaters1630 Words   |  7 Pages.. I m planning on buying the Xulu panelbeaters.#10; I want my Valentine. I want to be with her. Nzuzo... is this true? Um... Yes, we love each other. - What do you mean you love each other? - Melusi, I didn t plan any of this. Ever since I came back you call me Melusi and not Baba, because you love him! - We didn t know you d come back. - I m not talking to you! Look, we didn t do this on purpose. We spent a lot of time together after the case... I m talking to my wife! AfterRead MoreSummary : The Night 1499 Words   |  6 Pagesroad. As I was thanking whatever deity let me survive such a traumatic experience the seat belt unbuckles itself. The passenger door swings open, and I jump out of the car planning to say hello the ground by kissing it then realize the sidewalk isn t very clean so I don t. Morgana and I walk up to a house that looks like all the others on this street who could possibly know that one of the most important people in the entire world lives there. Morgana knocks on the door since there isn t a doorbellRead MorePre Crime Is Used For Criminals Based On Foreknowledge Provided By Precogs1153 Words   |  5 PagesImagine being that person. No one wants to go to jail, especially not for a crime they had no intentions of committing. Also this idea can t stop all crimes. That would be impossible. So why should it be okay that only some crimes are able to be prevented and others are not? The answer is that it s not fair. Sometimes lif e isn t fair. However, we shouldn t interfere with people s fate. If something s meant to happen, it should be allowed to happen. Life is supposed to be a continuous cycleRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Othello 1593 Words   |  7 PagesKimone Gordon Ms.Milliner EES21QH-09 1/20/17 OTHELLO : grit/mindset â€Å"I do not believe that any writer has ever exposed this bovarysme, the human will to see things as they are not, more clearly than Shakespeare (T.S. Eliot)†. Shakespeare used psychological traits to bring his work to life. in the play Othello uses grit and mindset to show people can be deceiving, untrustworthy, foolish and manipulative. Othello reflects how weRead MoreJerry and Molly and Sam Carver Short Cuts1261 Words   |  6 PagesCalifornia in America. In the story we meet the main character Al, who is 31 and he is a father to two children, Alex and Mary. We also meet his wife Betty and her sister Sandy. We hear about their old dog Suzy and the new dog Sam. And later in the story we meet Jerry and Molly. Shortly the story is about Al and his stressful life. He has problems with the wife, the kids and he also has financial problems, but his smallest problem is the new dog, Sam. And Al tries to get rid of the dog and in the lastRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Mac beth 1202 Words   |  5 Pagesdied, don t you think that s just more than a coincidence? asked Banquo. Yeah, I know what you mean, something weird is going on. answered Macduff. Well, I don t know about you, but I m going to get out of this country, if Macbeth is really going to become the king then this country is going down the drain and I don t want to be a part of it; what are you going to do? said Banquo. I honestly don t know, regardless of who the king is, my duty is to be loyal to the end, but I understandRead MoreDon t Tell Your Secrets1374 Words   |  6 PagesHey, I know it hasn t been a while since we talked, but for me it seemed like forever. Just yesterday I sent you messages but you didn t reply, which is odd because you keep telling me that we d only stop talking with each other once were dead. Are you still alive? Just kidding I know you are or else you won t be reading this letter. We ve been friends ever since we are young that s why I know everything about you. Also, you tell me your secrets. Your deepest and darkest secrets. Don t worryRead MoreTrue Grit And Ray From Charles Portis s The Dog Of The South Show Devotion1369 Words   |  6 Pagesdevotion. Throughout True Grit Mattie is shown to be obsessive, which is shown through her devotion throughout the novel. That is my father. I stood there looking at him. What a waste! Tom Chaney! Would pay for this! I would not rest easy until that Louisiana cur was roasting and screaming in hell(24). Mattie ultimately is enraged at the fact a drunken coward kills her father, She set s out to find her father s killer, since she has an obsession over her father s death. Another piece of evidenceRead MoreDescriptive Essay - Original Writing1616 Words   |  7 Pagesbreeze blowing through my hair. I was on my way back from Donnie Ronald’s annual Guns and BBQ, where all the local guys come and shoot guns in Donnie’s basement gun range. Walking home I started to get a little hungry, I decided to take a shortcut knowing there would be some deer at the river. I walked through the swampy area of the Big Cypress Swamps just north of the Everglades. I had my military boots on and was p repared to go through the wet muddy area, with my gun and my knife, I was prepared forRead MoreDestructive Love In Shakespeares Macbeth And Wuthering Heights1408 Words   |  6 Pagesstarting off with Lady Macbeth pressuring Macbeth to kill Duncan. Macbeth not wanting to kill his king, finally caves in to his wife s request and ends up doing the deed. Lady Macbeth has her husband wrapped around her finger and she knows Macbeth will give her what she wants. In Wuthering Heights, Heathcliff is madly in love with Catherine and as she is with him but Catherine was more interested more into money and social status, that s why she married Edgar because he was the one who could give

The Definition of Euthanasia in Different Perspectives Free Essays

string(111) " the doctor does something o bring about the patient’s death: he \[actively\] kills him† \(1024\)\." Euthanasia is defined by The American Heritage Dictionary as â€Å"the action of killing an individual for reasons considered to be merciful† (469). Here, killing is described as the physical action where one individual actively kills another. Euthanasia is tolerated in the medical field under certain circumstances when a patient is suffering profoundly and death is inevitable. We will write a custom essay sample on The Definition of Euthanasia in Different Perspectives or any similar topic only for you Order Now The word â€Å"euthanasia† comes from the Greek eu, â€Å"good†, and thanatos, â€Å"death,† literally, â€Å"good death†; however, the word â€Å"euthanasia† is much more difficult to define. Each person may define euthanasia differently. Who is to ecide whether a death is good or not? Is any form of death good? All of these questions can be answered differently by each person. It is generally taken today to mean that act which a health care professional carries out to help his/her patient achieve a good death. Suicide, self-deliverance, auto-euthanasia, aid-in-dying, assisted suicide — call it what you like — can be justified by the average supporter of the so-called â€Å"right to die movement† for the following reasons: The first reason is that an advanced terminal illness is causing unbearable suffering to the individual. This uffering is the most common reason to seek an early end. Second, a grave physical handicap exists that is so restricting that the individual cannot, even after due care, counseling, and re-training, tolerate such a limited existence. This handicap is a fairly rare reason for suicide; most impaired people cope remarkably well with their affliction, but there are some who would, at a certain point, rather die. We say that there is a second form of suicide; justifiable suicide, that is a rational and planned self-deliverance from a painful and hopeless disease which will shortly end in death. I do not hink the word â€Å"suicide† sits well in this context but we are stuck with it. Suicide is the taking of one’s own life. Why does the term euthanasia even exist? Is euthanasia not suicide? A differentiation must be made between the two. Suicide is condoned by society as being unacceptable but euthanasia is viewed as moral and acceptable in most instances. The term â€Å"self-deliverance† is difficult to understand because the news media is in love with the words â€Å"doctor-assisted suicide†. This is because the news media is dissecting the notion of whether or not doctors, who are supposed to preserve life, should artake in euthanasia. The media is failing to look at the actual issue of euthanasia, but instead, they are looking at the decision of whether or not doctors should assist in euthanasia. Also, we have to face the fact that the law calls all forms of self-destruction There are ethical guidelines for euthanasia. If the following guidelines are met, then euthanasia is considered acceptable. The person must be a mature adult. This is essential. The exact age will depend on the individual but the person should not be a minor who would come under quite different laws. Secondly, the person must have learly made a considered decision. An individual has the ability now to indicate this with a living will (which applies only to disconnection of life supports) and can also, in today’s more open and tolerant society, freely discuss the option of euthanasia with health-care professionals, family, lawyers, etc. The euthanasia must not be carried out at the first knowledge of a life-threatening illness, and reasonable medical help must have been sought to cure or at least slow down the terminal disease. I do not believe in giving up life the minute a person is informed that he or she has a terminal illness. Life is precious, you only live once, and it is worth a fight. It is when the fight is clearly hopeless and the agony, physical and mental, is unbearable that a final exit is an option. The treating physician must have been informed, asked to be involved, and his or her response been taken into account. The physician’s response will vary depending on the circumstances, of course, but they should advise their patients that a rational suicide is not a crime. It is best to inform the doctor and hear his or her response. For example, the patient might be mistaken. Perhaps the diagnosis has been misheard r misunderstood. Patients raising this subject were met with a discreet silence or meaningless remarks in the past but in today’s more accepting climate most physicians will discuss potential end of life actions. The person must have a Will disposing of his or her This shows evidence of a tidy mind, an orderly life, and forethought, all things which are important to an acceptance of rational suicide. The person must have made plans to die that do not involve others in criminal liability or leave them with guilty feelings. Assistance in suicide is a crime in most places, although he laws are gradually changing, and very few cases ever come before the courts. The only well-known instance of a lawsuit concerning this is the doctor-assisted suicide of Dr. Kevorkian. The person must leave a note saying exactly why he or she is taking their life. This statement in writing removes the chance of misunderstandings or blame. It also demonstrates that the departing person is taking full responsibility for the action. These are all guidelines for allowing a euthanasia to take place. By this, I mean the doctor is involved in the patient’s decision and actively performs the euthanasia. I believe that passive euthanasia would show a lack of interest on the doctor’s part. Simply allowing a patient to die does not require a doctor’s Passive euthanasia should not even exist. Euthanasia is defined as â€Å"the action of killing†¦ † James Rachels states in his â€Å"Active and Passive Euthanasia† that â€Å"The important difference between active and passive euthanasia is that in passive euthanasia, the doctor does not do anything to bring about the patient’s death. The doctor does nothing and the patient dies of whatever ills already afflict him. In active euthanasia, however, the doctor does something o bring about the patient’s death: he [actively] kills him† (1024). You read "The Definition of Euthanasia in Different Perspectives" in category "Essay examples" Is allowing a patient to die considered to be an action? Rachels states â€Å"†¦ the process of being allowed to die can be relatively slow and painful, whereas being given a lethal injection is relatively quick and painless† (1020). Disconnecting respiratory devices is not an acceptable method of euthanasia. It causes the patient to starve for oxygen and gasp for it, but when he/she cannot breathe, the body is starved of oxygen and suffocates. This is not merciful by any means. Rachels also states, â€Å"One reason why so many people think that here is an important moral difference between active and passive euthanasia is that they think killing someone is morally worse than letting someone die† (1022). The idea that a patient utilizes a medical device and has grown dependent on it for life is a grim one indeed; however, relieving a patient who relies on this machine for his/her life by simply cutting it off is not acceptable. Leon Kass states in his â€Å"Why Doctor’s Must Not Kill,† â€Å"Ceasing medical intervention, allowing nature to take its course, differs fundamentally from mercy killing. For one thing, death does not ecessarily follow the discontinuance of treatment† (1034). This states my point exactly. Euthanasia is the physical action of putting someone to a painless death who is suffering tremendously. The passive nature of allowing someone to die is not euthanasia. This is not an physical action taken by a doctor to ease a patient’s suffering and The doctor should decide whether the ailment is curable and if it is not, he/she should decide whether the patient will live productively for months or even years to come. If the ailment is not immediately fatal, will it cause pain and suffering for the rest of he patient’s life? How old is the patient? Will he/she live much longer anyway? All these factors should come into play when deciding whether a patient should be euthanized; however, the doctor’s answers to these questions may differ from those of the patient and his/her family. It is up to the patient’s doctor to decide whether the patient’s ailment is indeed curable. The patient should be presented with the facts. The doctor should tell the patient exactly how it is and not project the false hope that the patient may recover. With this information, the patient can make an informed decision and feel that t is the best one. Sidney Hook states in his â€Å"In Defense of Voluntary Euthanasia† that â€Å"Each one should be permitted to make his own choice- especially when no one else is harmed by it. The responsibility for the decision, whether deemed wise or foolish, must be with the chooser† (1028). This is evidenced quite simply by the mere fact that everyone has civil rights and liberties. No one can decide who should die and who should not. Everyone is in complete control of his/her own life and; therefore, should be free to decide. Having considered the arguments in favor of auto-euthanasia, he person should also contemplate the arguments against it. First, should the person go into a hospice program instead and receive not only first-class pain management but comfort care and personal attention? Put simply, hospices make the best of a bad job, and they do so with great skill and love. The right-to-die movement supports their work, but not everyone wants a lingering death, not everyone wants that form of care. Today many terminally ill people take the marvelous benefits of home hospice programs and still accelerate the end when suffering becomes too much. A few hospice leaders claim that heir care is so perfect that there is absolutely no need for anyone to consider euthanasia. While I have no wish to criticize them, they are wrong to claim perfection. Most, but not all, terminal pain can today be controlled with the sophisticated use of drugs, but the point these leaders miss is that personal quality of one’s live is foremost to some people. If one’s body has been so destroyed by disease that it is not worth living, that is an intensely individual decision which should not be swayed. In some cases of the final days in hospice care, when the pain is very serious, the patient is drugged nto unconsciousness. If that way is acceptable to the patient, then so be it, but some people do not wish their final hours to be in that fashion. There should be no conflict between hospice and euthanasia, both are valid options in a caring society. Both are appropriate to different people with differing values. The other consideration is related to religion: does suffering glorify a person? Is suffering, as related to Jesus Christ’s suffering on the cross, a part of the preparation for meeting God? Are you merely a steward of your life, which is a gift from God, which only He may take away. If your answers to these questions is yes, then you should not be involved in any form of euthanasia. Remember that there are millions of atheists, as well as people of differing religions, and they all have rights, too. Many Christians who believe in euthanasia justify it by reasoning that the God whom they worship is loving and tolerant, and would not wish to see them in agony. They do not see their God as being so vengeful as refusing them the Kingdom of Heaven if they accelerated the end of their life to avoid prolonged, unbearable suffering. A doctor should not be allowed to â€Å"play God† and ecide who should live and who should die. In fact, even the patient should not be allowed to, but it is the patient’s life and he/she has to live it. So, it is only logical to allow the patient, and no one Another consideration must be that, by ending one’s life before its natural end, is one is depriving oneself of a valuable period of good life? Is that last period of love and companionship with family and friends worth hanging on for? Even the most determined supporters of euthanasia hang on until the last minute; sometimes too long, and lose control. They, too, gather with their families and riends to say goodbyes. There are important reunions and often farewell parties. Euthanasia supporters enjoy life and love living, and their respect for the sanctity of life is as strong as anybody’s. Yet they are willing, if their dying is distressing to them, to give up a few weeks or a few days at the very end and leave under their own control. Ultimately, the decision lies with the beholder. It is the right of a person to make his/her own choice, with some limitations. It is the doctor’s responsibility to provide the patient with an accurate prognosis so that the patient may make an educated decision. How to cite The Definition of Euthanasia in Different Perspectives, Essay examples